Page 40 - AQAR 2015-2016

6. Problem Encountered and Resources Required

Sometimes a few numbers of articles were submitted instantly to scrutiny committee, in
turn it will be sent to same expert who is already overloaded with similar duties, may

cause some delay in the process.

7. Concluding Notes
This process will certainly yield improvements over number of publications and their

quality.

Second Best Practice

1. Title of the Practice
. Assessment of Research Scholar s progress through timeline presentation and Karpagam

University Annual Research Congress (KUARC)

2. Objectives
The objective of this assessment is to ensure that the research work is progressing as

planned by reviewing the status at defined intervals over and above the regular doctoral

committee meetings.

3. The Context
It is not practically possible to foresee all the problems that will hamper the progress of

the research work without regular follow up. The outcome envisaged at each stage may
not happen all the times. The timely availability of resources and their effective use play

important roles in successful completion of the research work. Thus, regular review of the

progress becomes an essential activity.

4. The Practice

Every year in the month of June/July a time line presentation is organized by the research
section. The meeting is attended by the Research Director, HoDs and respective guides.

The research scholar presents the status of his research and future plans to complete it
with time line for each activity/stage. The observers will provide necessary feedback and

suggestions.

Karpagam Academy of Higher Education - AQAR 2015-2016 Page 39